The Garden and the Eagle

Every morning a flock of pigeons wait in expectation for my appearance; when I appear, they get excited, for I bring them bird food. My garden is a safe haven of food and fresh water for which the birds can feed, drink and wash.

The bird garden is my template for my contribution in helping others. Here I am not so important beyond being the guardian and maintainer of a safe space that provides food and water for the needs of birds. In dealing with victims of religious extremists, specifically children who suffer injustice at the hands of these extreme crazy people, my ideal role is still about creating safe spaces with tools, information and support for victims. This ideal is slightly at odds with my current role of direct challenges on religious extremists, of evidence gathering, of reporting the extremists to police and social media, as well as providing counter narratives to the false ones of the extremists. This conflict of ideal with my present role is put into context as a result of the disasterous involvement with a manipulative and deceitful so-called victim of extremists called Jamie Lofthouse.

One of the leading challenges of my fight against religious extremists who prey on children is that in my niche of child protection there are too many egos and empire builders, who have seen this ongoing struggle with the extremists as a way to enhance their personal brands, status, vanity and following. Jamie Lofthouse is one of those people whose intentions was never really about challenging injustices against children from religious extremists but more about ego and gaining a following for his YouTube branding. Nobody chooses to be a victim of predators such as the religious extremists but Lofthouse seemed to me to indulge and encourage the joy of victimhood, a kind of emotional vampire that preyed on my time, energy and good intentions in a very destructive way.

There are lots of people in my niche of child protection that wish to play the role of leader and hero, whereas my approach is different. Being in the limelight is something I hate and avoid; hence I am invisible and place importance not on me but upon the things I fight for: fighting a certain type of religious extremist that inflicts injustice on children (and by extension other vulnerable victims). I prefer to see myself as the standard bearer, like the one who carried the Eagle of a Roman Legion into battle: the standard bearer was not important, but the Eagle was. for to lose the Eagle brought disgrace to a Roman Legion, to the Roman Emperor and to Rome.

The one who bore the Eagle was not a hero or a leader, the Eagle is all anyone saw. The Eagle was the point where the Roman Legion rallied when facing defeat, defending to the death; it was the Eagle that moved with the Forlorn Hope, the first wave of attacks on a city wall which took the highest casualties. My role of being that invisible person holding the Eagle, is also the same as my preferred role of being the scout or Roman road builder moving at the head of the advancing Roman armies. The point is who I am, where I am or anything about my life, family and other personal details is irrelevant beyond being the equivalent of the invisible Eagle standard bearer.

The Garden and the Eagle is the ideal end points that I wish to move towards in practically everything I am involved in, not just in this niche of child protection. The matter concerning Jamie Lofthouse has created a massive crisis around roles, but is also an opportunity with blessings in disguise to move to getting to the Garden and Eagle end states.

The use of AI in child protection

Part of my work in protecting children from religious extremists is also the research and development of technology solutions to assist in protecting those children. Dealing with real world challenges to the wellbeing of children involves brainstorming how technology tools and processes can solve the problems that children might encounter that harms them. There are three end states that those like I work towards for children: the child feels safe; the child feels happy; the child feels healthy. A child is defined as one who is aged 17 and under.

A child facing kidnap by religious extremists

A child in Wales, who was violently kidnapped by religious extremists in the past in the Wilfred Wong case, faces a new threat of kidnap by religious extremists under the leadership of Richard Carvath. This falls under “the child feels safe” end state, and the religious extremists are the problem that requires a solution.

The solution suggests that every child in a community are allocated to the protection of an artificially intelligent network for that specific geographical location. Every child carries on their person as per their choice in a watch, bracelet, earring or pendent a chip at all times that sends out a regular ping with two pieces of information: where the child is; and who the child is. By means of trees or street lights, nodes can pick up the pings and triangulate the position of the child at all times relaying that back to the AI system. The chips can be automatically charged by means such as an electomagnetic field. The chips are simple enough to not need much power to work.

A child facing the threat of kidnap can be flagged up onto the AI system with priority given to their safety. By means of the ping four patterns can trigger an emergency response sending people such as the police to investigate: if the ping stops; if the ping stays in a position too long; if the ping is moving from point A to point B fast; if the ping moves out of a specific geographical zone. This outline is just one layer of a system that can assist in protecting children; and I would like to make it a crime to interfere in any way with the chip that protects children from the likes of Richard Carvath.

The children of Gaza: a war situation

There are around one million children, composing half of the 2.2 million population that is tightly packed together in a small space in Gaza. The homes, schools, and communities of these children are being destroyed by bombs; there is no electricity, water, food, or medical supplies; and communications are disrupted. Children are being separated from their caregivers; they are being injured; they are frightened; and they are getting lost. All end states apply to the situation: the child feels safe; the child feels happy; the child feels healthy.

The first challenges is that Israel currently can take down one server and power line to take out all the communications in a location. The solution is the use of a mesh network of nodes that can power themselves and operate independently of each other so that if one node is eliminated others can rewire communciations and retain the integrity of the network; also the capacity for self repair or building new nodes quickly to repace what is lost using drones or robots. Such systems are robust and difficult to take out, and there are also solutions against electro-magnetic types of attack as well.

The “ping” solutions as highlighted above is in play in Gaza, locating where the children are and who they are.

Another layer of an AI system is the proposed personal assistant to the child that is communicating with the system. This AI companion or friend of the child is to the AI system what a bee is to a beehive, one for every child, a million of them. This layer can provide the system with more indepth information: is the child hungry, injured, lost, trapped, distressed; sick? The system works alongside human support with the information as above with locations and identities of children that can move resources from points A to B even in total chaos.

The Gaza problems starts with dealing with the failure of communications and lack of information relative to the children, to create robust and active AI systems that can counter anything that Israel can do to destroy or disrupt them.

The way forward: AI in child protection

The above is a small glimpse into a future that I would like to see happen for children, and even if it is only about children, will have the capacity by default to change human history and society.

Matthew Taylor fails to protect his children

EDIT WITH NOTE ADDED By Project Night Watch. We have become aware that an unknown party sent a communication to Matthew Taylor of Brighton making vile and malicious threats against his former partner and children around February 2024. It is also noted that these threats have been made in a period of activity of threats, allegations and information drops by an unknown persons(s) that have attempted to involve us, the fake persona James Hind, and other innocent parties into what amounts to an organised conspiracy. A link in the malicious communication, that Taylor published on a blog, included a link to this blog post. Rather than delete this post, it was decided to add this edit. We condemn the threats being made against Taylor, and we are disgusted by the threats made to the children and partner of Taylor. The attempt to frame our group and the fake persona of James Hind by the unknown party has not been lost on us, and we are monitoring the situation to determine possible suspects behind the threats and other activity of recent weeks. Of the fake persona of James Hind, it was discontinued as a tool of communication because of recent events, and it is made clear that Hind and the background bio for the character are inventions with no connection to anyone living or dead. END OF EDIT.

In March 2022 Matthew Taylor, a Satan Hunter based in Brighton who accuses innocent people of harming children for Satan, made a video with the title “Help Sussex Police! I fear James Hind is sharing pornography with my 11 year old son.” This claim was false and malicious: I have never met or communicated with the son of Matt Taylor at anytime, either in real life or on the internet. I struck the video down with a complaint to YouTube. Had I done something like this, Taylor would have been straight to the police, and his social media would have been awash with this claim, such is the way of Taylor and his allegation making. Not only has Taylor failed to offer any evidence to support this claim he made, but I have not heard anything from the police, or any word from Taylor of a crime reference and police officer dealing so I can follow this claim up.

I mention the above as an example that Matthew Taylor is failing as a father to safeguard the best interests of his children, exposing them to the ugly, toxic and harmful storm of conflict that he daily whips up via his ongoing wars with his victims and critics going back years. In this example Taylor has unnecessarily weaponised his son against me by making vile and false allegations of sex crimes against that child. The child, who is aged around 13, now has the risk of a stigma attached to his name and face that he is a child sex abuse victim; and Taylor failed to protect even his own child as an alleged sex abuse victim from the stigma of that taint by keeping him anonymous; so now all his son’s friends and the world knows about this taint.

Matthew Taylor alleges in his many social media posts that many of his critics are paedophiles and members of a collective Satanic cult working against him. Taylor indeed has a lot of victims and critics, and a large number of these people he names as paedophiles. If Taylor really believed he was the target of a dangerous paedophile cult, would he not as a loving father make sure the images, video and names of his children are removed from his social media, or at least locked down and hidden? Apparently not, as images, names and videos of his children are posted all across his social media. There is one YouTube channel Taylor has open for all to see that the researchers of Project Night Watch noted includes a lot of children, and also his own children running around in their underwear and swimming trunks. My advice to Taylor is to at least lock that YouTube channel down so that only trusted family can see it. The parents of the other children on the videos would be horrified to see how their children are being exposed to all to see by Taylor.

Whilst this rollercoaster of drama may be something Taylor loves to indulge in, I am sure it is no fun for those around Taylor, such as his family, to be taken along the ride with him. In 2018 Taylor made a post about an incident with the mother of his children, a personal matter between them that should not have been aired in public via his blog post. The issue of contention between mother and Taylor was that whilst Taylor was looking after his two children when the mother was away, he used his daughters computer to access the internet and post things. Taylor says:

“I used <REDACTED: daughter name> computer to check my emails and social media, or according to the person who I will now refer to as a Moron, “I’ve been on the internet promoted my bullshit and uploading stuff,” the Moron has now threatened to stop me from ever seeing my children again.”

Guerrilla Democracy blog 12.07/18

Previous to this incident in 2017 and forwards Matthew Taylor was being arrested multiple times for posting content against certain people that ended in criminal convictions for him. In addition, in 2017 Taylor had been arrested and charged in relation to indecent images of children, including one image at Category B involving the direct sexual abuse of a child. With regards to the indecent images of children, Taylor could not explain how they came to be in his possession, which at least meant that his activities, even if he claimed no knowledge of it, had resulted in those images being found in his possession. So it comes as no surprise that the mother of his children would freak at his using their internet connection and the daughters computer putting them in the direct potential firing line of police raids, arrests, investigations and device seizures. Taylor was completely oblivious of the potential problems he could have exposed his children and partner to; instead playing the victim with an apparent lack of insight or empathy of the trouble and anxiety he was causing his partner.

In 2020 Matthew Taylor was arrested, as per what he claims, of taking three teenage boys into a woodland to show them beheading images of babies and also talking sexually to them. These boys were teens who went to school with at least one of his children. Taylor has even in recent days continued to draw attention to this matter, and resulted in a lot of attention to it on both the internet and in his own community. The stigma to his children because their community have an adverse opinion in relation to this incident to their father must be quite distressing. Taylor as usual plays victim and is lacking in insight or empathy of how his handling of this incident is impacting those around him.

In being share happy on his social media, Taylor gives his children plenty of adverse publicity by posting what should be confidential documents, including social services letters, police letters and court documents that all mention his children. In the letter from social services it related to a referral on the basis his home was filthy and unsuitable for children to stay in.

Most recently in 2022 Taylor invited into his home a man that some, including me, have an opinion he is in a homosexual relationship with, for a week or so, and who it is also suspected was allowed to sleep in the bed that his children use to stay with Taylor. The man, who goes by the internet name Convid, whose name is Julian Pomeroy, raised a lot of alarm when he was filmed with Matthew Taylor talking to four young teens in their swimming costumes and talking sexually about them to Taylor.

At least two children, those in the Hampstead Satanic Panic Hoax, had to obtain court orders to protect them and their family from Matthew Taylor.

There is a clear pattern emerging where Taylor is behaving in a manner that raises safeguarding issues not only for his own children but for any minor under the age of 18 he comes into contact with. All of this has a direct and indirect adverse impact on the son and daughter of Taylor, and I do hope he will make note of what has been written in this blog post and addresses these concerns that I and others have about him in relation to his and other people’s children.

In conclusion I advise Matthew Taylor to lock down and remove any content he has posted in relation to his children. I ask Taylor not to film and post images and video of anyone under 18 without their caregivers permission. I ask he does not contact those under the age of 18, and especially does not encourage or allow sexual discussion about them. In the matter of the underage nephew and niece of a critic of Taylor known as Plisko, that he removes all mentions of them in his content, and that he blocks and ignores them. Lastly, I ask Taylor to stop weaponising his children against his critics and involving them in his ongoing disputes with people on the internet.

Hard week for Project Night Watch

WordPress told me this week that I have made 500 blog posts on this site over the ten years of the life of this site. It is a milestone that comes in a time of great change for I and my team. This week has been a hard week of trial and conflict navigating through a series of challenges and changes in our operations against the Satan Hunters.

With the recent change of branding our team is known as “The Watch” and our project is known as “Project Night Watch”. The focus is on 24 Satan Hunters who we believe are a danger to the vulnerable and children as a result of their extremism. Satan Hunters are QAnon-like extremists who accuse innocent targets of doing harm to children for Satan. The past week was marked with pitched battles with various Satan Hunters; dealing with a Satan Hunter making threats to kill against the police and their own partner; as well as an ongoing plot to kidnap a child and possibly target police officers and their families. I lost a friendship, and a professional relationship is on the edge of collapse, because of the fast moving changes the Project is undergoing.

There is at the time of writing only our Project and the activist behind Spin vs Truth left standing on the battlefield between the Satan Hunters and the victims such as the Hampstead teens and the victims in the Wilfred Wong case. The situation with the police and the social media companies is at the worst it has ever been in that they are for whatever reason unable to protect the children and the vulnerable from extremists like Satan Hunters. The pressure on me and the Project is at the harshest it has ever been in the eight years I have acted as an activist against Satan Hunters. The situation overall is pretty dire.

Hard decisions are being made in exceptional circumstances. The Project is undergoing a substantial change in how we are operating: the pace of change is painful to be where we need to be in the new reality that now exists with the Satan Hunters and their victims. If we vanish, there will be little opposition left to the Satan Hunters and their predation upon the victim. The system as it stands favours the predator and not the victim.

It is not for me to wallow in woe, it is what it is. We have a long way to go to be an effective Project that benefits the victims and supports those who can protect the victims from Satan Hunters. Two major focal points for the Project is on information driven activities and on the deployment of artificial intelligence in our operations. We are not taking on anymore extremists outside of the 24 we have identified. We are in ongoing discussions how those 24 Satan Hunters relate to various proposed end states for where our Project should go, which is to say it is not about the 24 Satan Hunters, but about how we can create something that can be useful and lasting such as changes in the law or in creating a tool such as an AI system that can protect victims from the Satan Hunters. Sure, I will have my own personal project of writing a book about the 24 Satan Hunters, but the Project has larger goals, as yet undefined. None of us want to be stuck around forever dealing with Satan Hunters.

One of the unfortunate outcomes of the last week is that even for many victims of Satan Hunters the question arises of how beneficial we are to them, indeed two felt in recent months that our activities has made their experience worse for them, they argued their cases with the police was compromised and that the attacks upon them increased because of the Project; admittedly those two cases was because the two victims were already in the public eye, whilst in most cases our involvement with victims are invisible and thus do not bring about the sort of issues as happened in those two cases. There is also a balance we have to make in not compromising our security that protects our lives, reputations and families from the sort of malign harm Satan Hunters can do in balance in our work of protecting victims. For one victim in a zoom chat, they did not understand why I would not show my face, even though they experienced the full range of effects of Satan Hunters stalking and harming them. The onus, as it always has been, is on the individual to protect themselves and their families, since the police, courts and social media companies won’t do it. One proposal is that we could step back and allow an AI tool to take on most of our work, with our focus then on the security of the system and the information in that system.

So, what policies have we got in place so far?

One point of reference

I am the public face of the Project, the one who does the social media posts and for which anyone, victims, media, police and other interested parties can contact. Only I have access to the official social media accounts of this Project, such as this site. Only I have access to the e-mail account people can contact us by. Only I can post anything related to the Project to social media sites. It is I who take full legal responsibility for what is put out, and it is I who will rise and fall based upon what is written on behalf of the Project. The other members of the Project can get on with doing the research, reporting and other administrative aspects of the Project without needing to worry about dealing with the public. One of the team is at risk, not the others. The others of the Project only come to the attention of police and other agencies when they report things like crimes against Satan Hunters.

Passive sock accounts

Outside of the accounts that are clearly identified as mine, the Project only has sock accounts for the purposes of monitoring and intelligence gathering. The handlers of those accounts are forbidden to use them to communicate or do any action outside of protecting their integrity. We totally condemn those who use the names of other people to create fake profiles of them to post as.

Private communications are never shared

Those who communicate with me, your communications are never shared or published. Such publications get deleted. The Satan Hunters Shellie Mote and Sheva Burton communicated with me a great deal in the past, and all those communications were deleted. Sadly the same Shellie Mote and Sheva Burton will republish confidential communications they had with people. There is a major difference in integrity and professionalism between us and Satan Hunters.

Anonymity

Despite the claims of various Satan Hunters and their followers, my name and personal details remain anonymous. The same goes for my team who work invisibly behind the scenes. We operate under layers of security. If one of us becomes compromised, it is unlikely others will be. We have protocols in place for dealing with threats to any of our team and their families, which will be dealt with by us and not by the police, which is to say Satan Hunters won’t like what we will do to them if they threaten any of us like they do to their victims.

Those under age of 18

We DO NOT have anyone under the age of 18 working with us. We DO NOT work with or have any contact with anyone under the age of 18. We will NEVER work with anyone known to be under the age of 18.

One of the favoured weapons of Satan Hunters is to claim a target is harming children. We have NO access or contact to children or under 18’s in our operations and thus we are protected from the risks that such contacts can bring. Since I am the only point of contact for the Project, the risks of children coming in contact with us is low and unlikely. We will terminate any contacts with under 18’s if they should contact us, and we discover their age. Since there are a number of child victims of Satan Hunters, we do refer to them in police referrals, but we have zero contact with those children.

We are the target of a lot of false allegations by Satan Hunters and their followers (their favoured weapon) along the lines of harming children; but it is false and unevidenced allegations.

Challenging Satan Hunters for the purposes of preventing and investigating crime is a niche area of child protection. Satan Hunters mask their extremist activities under the cover of protecting children, and all the 24 Satan Hunters we monitor has harmed or abused a child(ren) in some manner.

Jeanette Archer and the “kidnap” of a 16-year-old boy

The UK’s leading promoter of Satanic Panic narratives Jeanette Archer of Cranleigh recently became excited by the story of social workers backed by a small army of police who were said to have “kidnapped” a 16-year-old boy of a leading Freeman of the Land activist. Archer and her 20,000 strong “Satnic” Cult of followers were in the early stages of an internet campaign to “rescue” the boy back from the “Satanists.”

What is the real story behind this “kidnap” of a 16-year-old boy?

So what was the real story of this “kidnap”? The mother of the boy, a major name in the Freeman of the Land movement, had taken over land that did not belong to them to squat in derelict buildings, asserting their self-claimed right to do so. The boy was with this small group of Freeman of Land activists trying to create their “utopian” idea of a self supporting community outside of the UK laws, no doubt applying for State Welfare benefits at the same time. Quite rightly the social workers felt a minor living in a derelict building was not living in a safe place, and they applied for a court order to have the boy taken into care to a more safer environment. The Freeman of the Land activists, including the mother, asserted their claims not to consent to UK laws and demanded the release of the boy, and began a major internet campaign to get the boy released from care, thus the interest of Jeanette Archer and her “Cult”.

Should young people be considered adults at age of 16?

This story is one of those awkward situations, because the 16-year-old boy in the video I viewed clearly did not want to be taken into care, and had preferred to live in the derelict building with his mother and her friends. I am of the opinion that those who reach 16 are of a mature enough age to be considered adult and to have a right to choice and liberty to how they wish to live their lives. If I was this boy at the age of 16, I would have been less calm, and it would have been a hard fought messy situation. The boy is at that age, which if he does not want to be in care, there is nothing much that social workers, police and the family courts can do about it other than lock him in prison to keep him from running away. I am of the opinion that young people be given the full rights as adults from 16.

Jeanette Archer promotes ideas Satanists (the State) harms children

Satan Hunters such as Jeanette Archer promote the idea that Satanists are kidnapping, trafficking and disappearing children into vast hidden networks which then will rape, torture, murder and eat them in hunts, parties and rituals in honour of Satan. Archer claims that these networks prostitute out the children and also profit from using them in the pornography industry. Jeanette Archer does not provide evidence for these claims, but her influence and brand comes from promoting these ideas, which has become a profitable business for her. Archer claims that the Satanists include the police, family courts and social workers, thus why she and her “Cultists” have an interest in this story of the boy being taken into care.

Freeman of the Land activists and ideas encourage child abuse

The Freeman of the Land types are the sort of people who actually encourage situations where children can be abused and disappeared. The Freemen claim they do not consent to UK laws, preferring to live off-grid in their own communities, often illegally at the expense of others. Jeanette Archer encourages Freeman of the Land ideas to take children out of schools and home-school them, also to pursue alternative dubious medical remedies to sickness, and to live outside of the law. Children can disappear from the system amongst Freeman of the Land communities, and can live in neglect and abuse with nobody being any the wiser. Freeman of the Land and Satan Hunter networks also attract the mentally ill, child abusers and paedophiles, and there is no safeguarding checking systems in place to prevent those individuals getting at the children in their networks. There is nothing to stop paedophiles from setting up Satan Hunter and Freeman of the Land networks designed to take children off grid to abuse.

The UK has a duty to intervene with children and young people

The UK State had a duty of care to intervene in the matter of the 16-year-old, because if the State did not act and allowed the Freeman of the Land to dictate the situation, then it would become acceptable to allow children and young people to live in squalor, neglect and abuse without intervention, which would turn the clock back to Charles Dickens Victorian England; a situation we are in danger of becoming as a nation.

Jeanette Archer could bring about the situation of child abuse

The only way that it can be certain that children are not being disappeared into abusive networks is to have in place systems that can monitor where they are, what they are doing and who they are with, backed by the appropriate checking and intervention systems. This is why Satan Hunters such as Jeanette Archer and the Freeman of the Land activists cannot be allowed to dictate the situation, because they would bring about the very situation they claim to be fighting against in the matter of child protection.

Matt Taylor: the case of a Satan Hunter dangerous to women and children

An example of the feeling of harassment staff felt at the hands of Brighton Satan Hunter Matt Taylor.

The UK Online Safety Bill cannot come too soon in the opinion of this writer; which will include measures to protect women and children. The Satan Hunter Matt Taylor from Brighton in the UK is a typical case worth highlighting as to why this Bill is so important: in the opinion of this writer, Matt Taylor is a danger to women and children.

Matt Taylor is probably at the top of the list of Satan Hunters (grifters who promote narratives of Satanists eating babies) with the most criminal complaints against them during 2021. As an obsessive social media addict and fiend, Matt Taylor has waged a campaign of harassment and stalking for years and years via dozens of social media accounts. At the end of November 2021 Matt Taylor suddenly went silent on the internet, with rumours circulating that the police had finally done something about him after being drowned in dozens of complaints against Taylor from a large number of victims over the last year. Taylor, an individual incapable of controlling his impulsive need to post on social media, seems to have been curbed by something, although this writer is unsure which criminal complaint the police have acted upon.

Matt Taylor, a danger to women

A female victim of Taylor approached me in distress in 2021, to the point that I was worried they would commit suicide. Other women, of which there are many victims, have been public about their fear and distress because of the internet postings of Taylor, including Shellie Mote and Sharon Gale.

A high-profile female victim of Taylor was the Sussex Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne, who was nearly driven out of office by the stalking obsession of Matt Taylor. Bourne said:

“I felt very isolated,” she told this newspaper, “I didn’t want to show I was upset because I wanted to stay strong.

Eastbourne Herald 21/01/20

What Bourne felt at the hands of Matt Taylor is typical how many females feel after what this Satan Hunter does to them.

The female solicitor for Katy Bourne had to get a stalking protection order put on Matt Taylor as he started to target her in a distressing way.

A regular theme across the social media sites by Matt Taylor is how women are reduced to sexual objects for the pleasure of Taylor, for instance, a theme that women seek sexual pleasure from Taylor as part of his “harem”, occasionally with the names and faces of his female victims included.

Taylor as a bigot

Taylor is a bigot when it comes to both females, LGBT and alternative religions. A regular target of religious hate by Taylor is victim Shellie Mote, a pagan, who Taylor targets on a regular basis with “witch” images. Amongst the LGBT community are victims of Taylor such as Ann Drogyne and Reece Muttley, which in 2021 has resulted in the police issuing warnings against Taylor about.

Taylor targets fathers and their children

Taylor was convicted in the courts in relation to distressing conduct against a certain father and their children, which resulted in court orders to protect the children. Taylor caused alarm and distress to two more fathers over the safety of their children, as Taylor prowled like a demented hyena around their children in the Samantha Baldwin and Wilfred Wong cases. Taylor for instance even posted a fiction that I was the father of the Samantha Baldwin children. The kidnap victim known as Child A in the Wilfred Wong case had their safety threatened by posts by Taylor that potentially broke a court order; but after taking advice this writer did not refer Taylor to the police because they are “jigsaw identification” events, and not straightforward.

Taylor puts his own children at risk

Taylor pushes his children forward as human shields against his critics and victims. For example, when this writer posted the opinion that Taylor should be arrested and jailed for his ongoing illegal conduct, Taylor accused this writer of abusing his children; because to criticise Taylor in his opinion is an alleged abuse of his children, Taylor argues would read such comments, and his children would be denied access to Taylor if he ended up in prison. Matt Taylor pushing his children, including their faces, onto his social media, and using them against his critics, is abusing those children. Taylor is of course the agent of his own misfortune, if his internet postings attract criticism and legal attention. When mixing his children up in the same social media sites as his postings in support of the ultra violent paedophilic network known as the Order of Nine Angles, one has to ask why he is even allowed access to his children?

Matt Taylor has been investigated by police in relation to children

Matt Taylor is share-happy when it comes to telling his readers about police investigations into his activities, some which disturbingly involve child protection issues. Matt Taylor previously shared that he had been under investigation for indecent images of children. Taylor, then, in July 2021 posted:

“Hiding in his own home for five days, before Sussex Police threatened to smash his door in, ex-RMP Soldier Matt Taylor was arrested for taking three 15-year-old boys into the woods to have sex with, after showing them videos of beheadings.”

Guerrilla Democracy Blogspot 06/07/21

He gave further particular details:

“Walking home and chatting with three teenage boys, (one of whom Taylor recognized as being his daughter’s classroom friend, whom he has known all his life), has resulted in a serious allegation being made that Matt Taylor incited three teenage boys to come into the woods with him, after showing them videos of beheadings on his mobile phone.”

Guerrilla Democracy Blogspot 06/07/21

The UK Online Safety Bill is designed for addressing the suffering that Satan Hunters such as Matt Taylor cause for many victims that is a source of serious harm to women and children.

New direction against Satan Hunters

Satan Hunters gain their power through social media. I am changing direction to focus on technological solutions that will prevent what happened to Child A in the Wilfred Wong child kidnapping case and what happened to the Hampstead children. My work will deal more with information and technology rather than with “people”. I will focus more time on gathering information, and presenting this information in a useful way to the legal authorities on the Satan Hunters. I will be spending time on developing satanhunter.com. I will be working on technological solutions to protect children, and giving control of personal information to the user rather than the social media companies (ending their business models).

Today marks a year since Wilfred Wong and his fellow gang of Satan Hunters kidnapped a child in Wales. This unfortunate anniversary marks a change of direction for me in my fight against the Satan Hunters.

I feel like I am on a hamster wheel

It feels like I am running on a hamster wheel at times when trying to protect children from Satan Hunters; those fraudsters who promote Satanic Panic for money, power, revenge, fame and ideology. One Satan Hunter goes to jail, another Satan Hunter appears. Each Satan Hunter takes an enormous amount of resources of time, money and energy to deal with; where the activist challenging Satan Hunters is always at risk of harm or legal conflict themselves from their efforts to curb the Satan Hunter. And, there are the Satan Hunters who will come out of jail, such as the rumour of Sabine McNeill later this month, who will repeat what they did before. There are serial Satan Hunters such as Angela Power Disney, apparently untouchable, who jumps from one child victim to another, with now three more vulnerable distressed families she is preying on. As it stands, the Satan Hunters keep on coming, and the list of child victims keeps on growing.

Satan Hunters prey on adults and children

As well as the child victims, the Satan Hunters will prey on adult sex abuse victims, the mentally ill or those made vulnerable by other circumstance; who are groomed and manipulated by entire networks of Satan Hunters such as the cultish one run by Jeanette Archer. These adult victims come to the table with complex needs, made worse by the impacts of Satan Hunter manipulations. The list of these type of victims are expanding at a fast rate, due to the easy access to them by highly dishonest and manipulative networks that include churches and therapists, that recruit them, use them and spew them out in a broken heap when they are finished with them.

A desire to come off the hamster wheel

I personally have no desire to be on a hamster wheel for the rest of my life in fighting Satan Hunters and their paedophile friends; as I have a vision to end the reign of terror of these Satan Hunters on a more permanent basis. I also have no desire to be drawn into the politics and relationship conflicts various fellow activists have with each other, which has plagued me during 2021.

My successes in information gathering and reporting

My strongest successes in 2021 against the Satan Hunters has been in information gathering, then presenting that information in a manner that is useful to the police and courts to act upon. I have played my part in the chain of action that has resulted in the legal authorities taking action against Satan Hunters. I have also successfully provided a reporting function about Satan Hunters and their activities, that people have found useful on social media. These are two areas I want to focus upon going into 2022.

The need to develop a quality internet site on Satan Hunters

Repeatedly, people come to me, including journalists, for quality information about the Satan Hunters, as the information is scattered and confusing across the internet. Having a quality source of information on Satan Hunters is a vital tool in the war against Satan Hunters, which I want to develop through satanhunter.com. This internet site is something I want to focus upon over the next few years. I can do the SEO to make sure the search engines make this site the key site for anything related to the Satan Hunters and the cases I focus upon.

Satan Hunters get their power through social media

The power of the Satan Hunters is because of social media. The social media companies have allowed the Satan Hunters to build networks and a platform for themselves to hurt children. Wilfred Wong was motivated to kidnap a child because he was encouraged in his delusions by podcasters such as Shaun Attwood and Jon Wedger giving him a voice; Wong was backed by a huge network of people through the power of social media. The lives of the Hampstead children were ruined by the sharing of their names, faces, video and intimate medical reports amongst a million people via social media. Constant attempts have been made to do to Child A in the Wilfred Wong case what has been done to the Hampstead children. Satan Hunters such as Becki Percy, Nathaniel Harris and Matt Taylor have made life a misery for years for countless victims via social media. Social media companies have encouraged the Satan Hunters in their abusive actions, and failed to address the distress of the victims such as Child A and the Hampstead children, even when reports were made; for example, about Eire-based Satan Hunter Angela Power Disney. The social media companies will have to be transformed or destroyed.

My new focus on technological solutions to protect children

I have ideas of technological innovations that I would like to pursue to address the problems of how the internet allows the Satan Hunters and the paedophiles to harm children. For instance, how a photo of the Hampstead children can remain under their full control by a type of tagging, with all unauthorised copies destroyed. Another example, how the activities of children can be monitored 24/7 by AI, who can spot harmful activity such as by paedophiles, and instantly take action to curb the activity. In the same way as images are tagged, to have a user tagged, so an AI can make a child invisible to adults outside of their real life activities; so an adult in Iran could not get access to a child unknown to them in their bedroom in Scotland. A fight for control of personal information with the social media companies, giving 100% control to the user, ending the current business models of social media companies that require control of user information in order to earn advertising revenue. These innovations require a type of AI that I have in mind of creating.

These are the new directions I am heading in. It is pure information and systems research, design and execution. “People” stuff is what I am taking a step back from; I am looking to a more intellectual approach to fighting Satan Hunters; and AI will have a lot to do with that.

My fight with the Satan Hunters is driven by a feeling of injustice

Little James Hind, perhaps aged five or six; injustice carved his heart, life and destiny like an expert artist. His doom is this injustice that drives his passion and focus, the agenda of why he fights Satan Hunters, to prevent that injustice being experienced by children. The doom is accepted, for what is created by this doom will also be ended by it.

An angry e-mail. “You hypocritical lying b*d” ! accused the e-mail. If e-mails could burst into flames, this was one. “I don’t know what your agenda is” said the e-mail. It was like a question mark that stood a second in the air, then ignited to ash.

Such is the life of fighting Satan Hunters, my social media posts will upset someone. Today, it was the turn of a former ally against the Satan Hunters, who stood in line with the Satan Hunters to find fault with my deeds and words. It is a wise person to see in the conflicts of life an opportunity to test truth, and the indignant scribe did raise a good question: “What is my agenda in fighting the Satan Hunters?”

Reality testing is important to me, so I ask questions of my motivations, thoughts and feelings all the time. I live in a permanent trap of dissociation, the gift given to me by my childhood abusers, where the world around me, my senses and my feelings don’t feel real, and I live as if in a perpetual film, where I am the observer of my own life, but not the participant. As the only cause of a million causes I could have fought, fighting Satan Hunters is the cause I feel motivated to throw my life behind, at a vast expense of money, energy and time out of my life; so the question of what my agenda is in fighting Satan Hunters is an important one.

The day before the fiery e-mail landed in my inbox, I learned of a new addition to my family. The photo I saw of the newborn baby was cute: a sleeping infant in the embrace of the mum, trusting, safe and secure. My busy brain got to work when I saw that picture of the baby: was I fighting the Satan Hunters to make a safer world for this baby? What I noted in my reaction to the baby, was that I did not want that baby to suffer the experience of Child A in the Wilfred Wong case, or the Hampstead children, the prey of Satan Hunters. It was not so much that I wanted to make a better world for the baby to live in, but a strong desire that the baby would not suffer the injustice of the child victims of Satan Hunters.

It is a feeling rather than a value, ideal or principle that drives my fight against the Satan Hunters. It is a feeling that is difficult to describe: a burning outrage that rises up whenever I encounter it; and woe those that triggered it. Born no doubt from my own childhood abuse experiences of adults and people in authority using their power against my vulnerablity, this feeling against injustice rises when I encounter someone in power harming something that is weak or vulnerable. Although it rises at harm done to animals, the feeling rises more so when children suffer injustice.

Although those who campaign for children talk about an ideal set in a future, I exist outside of time: so past, present and future mean nothing to me. The feeling of injustice is what matters, and motivates me. I have tried to rectify injustices done to children that happened hundreds of years in the past. I am committed to fighting long wars that will last years and decades against the Satan Hunters, and against the Social Media companies that enabled those Satan Hunters. Of the Social Media companies, nothing short of their destruction would satisfy me. I supported Brexit, even campaigned for it, only because the EU gave the Satan Hunter Sabine McNeill a platform to speak. Satan Hunters such as Becki Percy and Angela Power Disney underestimate the pure resolve I have to bring them to justice. All this driven by my feeling of injustice.

The kidnapping of Child A by Satan Hunter Wilfred Wong and his gang; the torture and release of intimate details of the children in the Hampstead SRA Hoax, sent my feeling of injustice into full blaze; except there is no heat, but a deadly darkest winter that would instantly frostbite anyone close to it’s embrace. Winter is Coming is a good saying for any Satan Hunter I feel my sense of injustice against.

What Satan Hunters really mean when they say they are fighting for the children, is that children are their pawns to an end such as fame, money, power, revenge and ideology. The children the Satan Hunters come into contact with are preyed upon by Satan Hunters: Child A and another child in the kidnapping by Wilfred Wong have PTSD, probably for life; the children in the Hampstead case, now in their teens, who must face the humiliation of their faces, names, medical reports, and intimate video tapes circulating constantly on the internet thanks to the Satan Hunters. The Hampstead children can enjoy no teen life in anything that gives them media or internet publicity, because of the Satan Hunters, who will stalk and harass; not even the successful little business that won the Hampstead children a major award a few years ago, ruined because of Satan Hunters.

It is the case that when I fight for Child A or the Hampstead children, their injustice reminds me of the injustice done to me as a child. And when I look at the newborn baby in my own family, all I see is a child I am motivated to protect from the same injustice.

So, the answer to the question “What is my agenda in fighting the Satan Hunters?” It is a feeling of injustice that fuels my passion and focus to prevent children from experiencing the feeling of injustice I suffered, which children are now experiencing at the hands of Satan Hunters.

When Satan Hunters such as Jeanette Archer says she will sacrifice her life for the “children”, her words are empty; she has agendas like power, fame and money driving her. Archer is a coward, and would throw a child under a bus, if it served her agenda. No children will ever be saved by Archer; her harvest is a trail of broken children.

In the cold winter darkness something is following Jeanette Archer. The Winter is Coming, and it will never stop, because a feeling of injustice drives it onwards; that no army, mountain or god can stop. And woe to any Satan Hunter the angry wintery shadow with a frosty passion will challenge, because this type of champion will die in the embrace of it’s passion. It might not be noble values, ideals and principles that drives a wintery creature, but a feeling of injustice; although the end state is the same, children benefit, Satan Hunters do not.

Artificial intelligence and the professional

Artificial intelligence is an inappropriate and flawed tool when it comes to decision-making over people issues, such as if child should be taken from their family into protective custody.

It is likely that I and my business will contribute to the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), so I have a good idea about the limits and potential of this technology.  I wanted to touch on how AI should be a tool or assistant to a professional rather than replacing or undermining that individual.

It’s the great fashion in recent years that everyone gets into AI, which usually means either they have something that automates a system, or it is a pattern recognition tool that pulls conclusions out of big data fed to a network, which acts on the conclusion.  There is a lot of people in government, business and public services who have been sold a bag of poop that AI will save costs and provide a better service if it was used to replace people in the decision-making process in people-related situations.  For example, recruitment by big corporations is now increasingly being automated by AI, so that unless you know how to game the system, it will work against you, and people are reduced to the level of cattle in the corporate system.

There is an obsession with big data, which always has to be cleaned up by low paid humans in places like India to be useable in a pattern recognition system.  These pattern recognition systems such as neural networks operate according to hundreds and thousands of data points, building up through statistics a model upon which conclusions and decisions are made. These models and processes are so complex that not even the designers know how they come to their conclusions, what is called a black box situation.

These models are being used to make life changing decisions about people and their families, for instance if a child should be taken into care, or the appropriate penalty in a criminal conviction, or if someone should be liable for parole.  This impacts me too, I have today been to my first meeting with medical professionals, who consider I should have an autism assessment, but I also shared things like I suffered depression and had thought about suicide.  All I know, this information I shared is being fed into an AI system and it might spit out some conclusion that might lead to me being sectioned by the end of this week, all based on an AI data model rather than human decision-making.

If the reader has coded anything, they will learn that bad code and inputs result in bad outputs.  For example, if I dumped into an AI system voting intentions of a large sample of voters in Clacton UK, and used this to predict how the UK will vote in an overall general election, it might suggest UKIP would form the next government, but when the prediction is tested in real life, UKIP will if they are lucky only have control of the Clacton seat in Parliament. In a rising number of cases it has been discovered that the models built on big data are faulty, biased against certain groups, and are unable to handle unique situations.  People are forced to conform to a narrow set of categories to access services or be on the good side of a statistical artificial computer model that has no relation to reality.

It is a tragedy that for reasons of money, faith in a flawed technology, and a lack of trust of the wisdom and knowledge of human beings with decades of experience in their fields, the AI has replaced the human with tragic consequences for individuals and society.  Families wrongly suffer their children being taken into care, or being imprisoned because the computer judged according to its model this was the right outcome, and nobody can challenge the system data model, because nobody understands how it came to the conclusion.

This is never the way to go for AI, a great tool if used correctly, but totally inappropriate in people-focussed decision-making.  The AI is a useful tool or assistant where the human takes the lead, enhancing their decision-making, for instance in project management, not in decision-making when it comes to people.

My dislike of false allegation makers

Becki Percy a Twitter user @becki_p20 is an example of a false allegation maker denying justice to child victims of sex abuse.

As a victim of child abuse I recognise the harm that false allegation makers do, not only that they destroy lives of those that they make false allegations against, but also the harm they do to real victims of child abuse.

It is no longer enough for false allegation makers to claim that they were subject to crimes ranging from being indecently touched to being anally raped, or that it was an uncle or random stranger; these individuals now must include into their narrative CIA, Illuminati, politicians, actors, and sinister Satanic cults, with the most sadistic and bizarre of stories.  It seems a whole industry of allegation making has emerged with each individual and group trying to out-do the other with more elaborate narratives.

The internet makes it easy and with instant win to make false allegations, that professional false allegation makers such as Becki Percy @becki_p20 on Twitter rolls off allegations that people are paedophiles as if handing out candy, such as:

Elon Musk with his 22+ million Twitter followers currently pursues an innocent British man who helped save children from flooded caves in Thailand with paedophile allegations, offering no evidence to support those allegations, all because that individual criticised his offer of a submarine in the rescue effort.

The challenge for children with mundane allegations of child sex abuse against mundane individuals, they now fear that they won’t be believed, and that the police no longer have the resources to investigate their complaints, because the false allegation makers have undermined the credibility of those that make complaints of child abuse, and have stolen the limited resources of law enforcement in order to investigate false claims of child abuse.

The UK Sun newspaper reports that the Cliff Richard child abuse investigation, based upon false allegations made against him, cost £800,000, which is a lot of resources wasted that could have been spent on investigating real crimes of sex abuse.

False allegation makers such as Becki Percy have teamed up with others to reinforce and protect a highly lucrative racket of false allegation making where they are trying to tie up law enforcement resources into expensive investigations against innocent people, and then deny ordinary kids with mundane sex abuse claims the ability to have their claims investigated.

As to Elon Musk, if ever one of my projects succeed in the artificial intelligence market, I will never ever work with him, his companies or his agents.